Skip to main content

Strict and Absolute Liability in Indian Law

Strict and absolute liability are two distinct concepts in tort law that impose responsibility without fault. This page explores both types of liability in the context of Indian law, providing insights for law students and practitioners.

Strict Liability​

Strict liability is a legal doctrine that imposes liability without fault. It applies to situations where the risk of harm is high and the consequences are severe.

The Indian Penal Code (IPC), Section 304A, deals with causing death by negligence:

markdown Kesaribai v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1981 SC 1348 The court held that the owner of a factory was strictly liable for pollution caused by its operation, even though it had taken reasonable care. ``

Absolute Liability​

Absolute liability is a stricter form of liability that applies to activities posing a significant risk to the environment or human life.

The Atomic Energy Act, 1962, imposes absolute liability on nuclear operators:

markdown Union of India v. Assam Company Ltd., AIR 1999 SC 387 The Supreme Court ruled that the Bhopal gas tragedy was an example of absolute liability, holding Union Carbide responsible despite its claims of taking reasonable precautions. ``

Conclusion​

Understanding strict and absolute liability is crucial for law students and practitioners dealing with tort cases. These concepts provide important tools for determining responsibility in situations where fault may not be clear-cut. Always refer to the latest legal precedents and amendments when applying these principles in practice.

Additional Resources​

  • Negligence in Tort Law
  • Environmental Torts
  • Product Liability