Skip to main content

Easements in Property Law

Governing Statute​

In India, the law of easements is codified in the Indian Easements Act, 1882, and NOT in the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. This is an important point: although both Acts share the year 1882, easements are governed by their own dedicated legislation. The Act applies to most of India (with some historical territorial variations), and where the Act does not apply, courts have generally applied the same principles as rules of justice, equity and good conscience.

Definition of Easement​

Section 4 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882 defines an easement as a right which the owner or occupier of certain land possesses, as such, for the beneficial enjoyment of that land, to do and continue to do something, or to prevent and continue to prevent something being done, in or upon, or in respect of, certain other land not his own.

Two pieces of land (or an interest in land) are central to every easement:

  • Dominant heritage – the land for whose beneficial enjoyment the right exists; its owner is the dominant owner.
  • Servient heritage – the land over which the right is exercised; its owner is the servient owner.

An easement is therefore a right appurtenant to land (it runs with the land), and not merely a personal right belonging to an individual. A common textbook illustration: A, as owner of a house, has a right of way over B's adjoining field to reach the public road. A's house is the dominant heritage; B's field is the servient heritage.

Essential characteristics​

  1. There must be a dominant and a servient heritage.
  2. The easement must accommodate (benefit) the dominant heritage.
  3. The dominant and servient owners must be different persons — one cannot have an easement over one's own land (such a right, while ownership is united, is only a quasi-easement).
  4. The right must be capable of forming the subject-matter of a grant.

Classification of Easements​

The Act and the general law recognise several overlapping classifications:

  1. Continuous and discontinuous (Section 5)

    • Continuous: enjoyment is, or may be, continual without the act of man — e.g., a right to receive light or air through a window, or a right of drainage.
    • Discontinuous: enjoyment requires the act of man for its exercise — e.g., a right of way.

  2. Apparent and non-apparent (Section 5)

    • Apparent (or express): evidenced by some permanent, visible sign — e.g., a visible drain or a doorway.
    • Non-apparent: there is no such visible sign — e.g., a right of way not marked on the ground, or a right that a neighbour's wall shall not be raised.

  3. Positive and negative

    • Positive: the dominant owner does something on the servient land — e.g., a right of way or a right to draw water.
    • Negative: the dominant owner prevents the servient owner from doing something otherwise lawful — e.g., a right that light and air shall not be obstructed.

  4. Easement of necessity and quasi-easement (Section 13)

    • An easement of necessity arises where property cannot be used at all without it — the classic example is a landlocked plot that can only be reached across the land it was carved out of. It is stricter than mere convenience: the necessity must be absolute.
    • A quasi-easement is a right that a single owner exercises over one part of his land for the benefit of another part; it ripens into a true easement on severance of ownership under the conditions set out in Section 13.

Note: Categories drawn from English land law such as "profits à prendre" (rights to take produce like sand, fish or timber from another's land) are treated separately in India. A profit is not, strictly, an easement under the Act, because it involves taking part of the soil or produce rather than merely using the land — students should be careful not to conflate the two.

Creation of Easements​

An easement may be acquired in the following principal ways:

  1. Express grant or reservation (Sections 8–12)

    • Created by the express words of a deed or agreement by a person competent to transfer the servient property. Example: a sale deed in which the seller grants the buyer a right of way over the seller's retained land.

  2. Implied grant / easement of necessity and quasi-easement (Section 13)

    • Arises by operation of law on the transfer or partition of land, where the right is necessary for enjoying the property transferred, or was in continuous and apparent use at the time of transfer.

  3. Prescription (Section 15)

    • An easement may be acquired by long enjoyment. The enjoyment must be as an easement, as of right, peaceably, openly, and without interruption for a continuous period of twenty (20) years.
    • For easements against Government property, the required period is thirty (30) years.
    • The twenty (or thirty) year period must be reckoned as ending within two years next before the institution of the suit in which the claim is contested.
    • Access and use of light or air to and for a building is a common subject of a prescriptive claim.

  4. Customary easements (Section 18)

    • A right may exist by virtue of a local custom (for example, a customary right of the villagers of a locality to use a path or to bathe at a ghat). Such customary rights are recognised independently of a dominant heritage.

Incidents: Rights and Obligations of the Parties​

  • Right to enjoy — The dominant owner may use the easement for the purpose for which it was acquired, and no further.
  • Accessory rights (Section 24) — The dominant owner is entitled to do such acts as are necessary to enjoy the easement; for example, a right of way carries the right to keep the path in a fit state for use.
  • Duty as to servient heritage — The dominant owner must exercise the right so as to cause the least practicable damage or inconvenience to the servient owner, and is liable for damage caused by want of reasonable care.
  • Servient owner's position — The servient owner is under no duty to do anything for the maintenance of the easement, but must not obstruct or interfere with its lawful enjoyment.

Extinction of Easements​

An easement may come to an end in several ways (Sections 37–47):

  1. By dissolution of the servient owner's right (Section 37) — when the person who created the easement had only a limited interest and that interest ends.
  2. By release (Section 38) — the dominant owner releases the right, expressly or impliedly, to the servient owner.
  3. By revocation (Section 39) — where the grantor reserved a power to revoke, or where a licence coupled with the right is revoked.
  4. By expiration of a limited period or on fulfilment of a condition (Section 40) — an easement granted for a fixed term or purpose ends when the term expires or the purpose is fulfilled.
  5. By termination of necessity (Section 41) — an easement of necessity ends when the necessity itself ceases (e.g., the landlocked plot obtains other access).
  6. By unity of ownership / merger (Section 46) — when the same person becomes absolute owner of both the dominant and servient heritages, the easement is extinguished, since one cannot have an easement over one's own land.
  7. By permanent alteration of the dominant heritage or by destruction of either heritage — where a permanent change makes enjoyment impossible or renders the easement useless.
  8. By non-enjoyment (extinction by abandonment) (Section 47) — a continuous easement is extinguished when it totally ceases to be enjoyed for a continuous period of twenty years; the period runs from the day enjoyment last took place.

Suspension of Easements​

An easement is not always extinguished when it cannot be used. Under the Act, an easement may be merely suspended — for example, where the dominant owner temporarily becomes entitled to possession of the servient heritage in a manner that does not amount to full unity of ownership — and it revives when the cause of suspension is removed.

Conclusion​

Easements are a distinct branch of Indian property law, codified in the Indian Easements Act, 1882, and should not be confused with the transfers dealt with by the Transfer of Property Act. For examinations, students should be able to: (i) state the Section 4 definition and the dominant/servient heritage concept; (ii) classify easements (continuous/discontinuous, apparent/non-apparent, positive/negative, necessity/quasi); (iii) explain the modes of acquisition, remembering that prescription requires twenty years (thirty against the Government); and (iv) list the statutory modes of extinction. Grounding each rule in the correct section of the 1882 Act is what distinguishes an accurate answer from a merely plausible one.