Skip to main content

Offences Against Public Justice

Overview​

Offences against public justice are dealt with in Chapter XI of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Sections 191 to 229A), titled "Of False Evidence and Offences against Public Justice." These offences protect the administration of justice by punishing conduct that pollutes the stream of evidence, misleads investigating and judicial authorities, or obstructs the lawful working of the courts and public servants.

Note: With effect from 1 July 2024, the IPC has been replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), which re-enacts these offences (broadly in Chapter XIV) with renumbered sections. For examinations still based on the IPC, the sections below apply. Always confirm the governing statute for your syllabus.

Why These Offences Matter​

Courts decide questions of life, liberty and property largely on the strength of the evidence placed before them. If witnesses lie on oath, if evidence is manufactured or destroyed, or if false charges are set in motion, the judicial process itself becomes an instrument of injustice. These offences are therefore treated as wrongs against the State and the public, not merely against a private individual.

Key Offences​

1. Giving False Evidence (Perjury) — Sections 191, 193​

Section 191 defines giving false evidence: a person legally bound by oath (or by an express provision of law) to state the truth, or bound by law to make a declaration, who makes a statement which is false, and which he either knows or believes to be false or does not believe to be true.

Section 193 prescribes the punishment. Broadly:

  • False evidence given at any stage of a judicial proceeding: up to 7 years imprisonment and fine.
  • False evidence in any other case: up to 3 years imprisonment and fine.

Essential ingredients:

  1. A legal obligation to state the truth (e.g., on oath, or in a verified pleading/affidavit).
  2. A false statement.
  3. The requisite mental state — knowledge or belief that it is false, or absence of belief in its truth.

The statement need not actually influence the court; the offence lies in making the false statement. An honest mistake of memory is not perjury, because the mental element is absent.

Illustration: A, a witness on oath, deposes that he personally saw B stab the victim, knowing that he was not present at the scene at all. A commits the offence of giving false evidence, regardless of whether the court believes him.

2. Fabricating False Evidence — Sections 192, 193​

Section 192 defines fabricating false evidence: causing any circumstance to exist, or making any false entry in a book or record, or making a document containing a false statement, intending that it may appear in evidence in a judicial (or other legal) proceeding and cause a person forming an opinion on that evidence to entertain an erroneous opinion on a material point.

Punishment is again under Section 193.

Distinction from giving false evidence: Giving false evidence (S.191) is essentially a false oral or written statement by a person bound to speak the truth. Fabricating false evidence (S.192) is creating false material (a fake document, a planted object, a false record) intended to be produced in a proceeding. The two often overlap but are conceptually distinct.

Illustration: A plants a weapon at a crime scene so that suspicion falls on B, intending that its discovery will be used in evidence. A fabricates false evidence.

3. False Evidence to Procure Conviction of a Capital Offence — Section 194​

Where a person gives or fabricates false evidence intending to cause, or knowing it to be likely to cause, the conviction of another for a capital offence, the punishment is enhanced (imprisonment for life or up to 10 years and fine). If an innocent person is actually convicted and executed as a result, the person who gave the false evidence may be punished with death or life imprisonment. This reflects the gravity of using the justice system to procure a wrongful death.

4. Threatening or Inducing a Person to Give False Evidence — Section 195A​

Section 195A punishes threatening another person with injury to person, reputation or property in order to make that person give false evidence. This provision protects the integrity of witness testimony against coercion. Inducing or abetting a witness to depose falsely can also attract the ordinary law of abetment (Sections 107–109) read with the false-evidence sections.

Illustration: A threatens to harm C's family unless C falsely testifies that he saw B commit theft. A is liable under Section 195A.

5. Causing Disappearance of Evidence / Screening an Offender — Section 201​

Section 201 punishes a person who, knowing or having reason to believe that an offence has been committed, causes any evidence of that offence to disappear, or gives false information respecting the offence, with the intention of screening the offender from legal punishment. The punishment is graded according to the seriousness of the offence being screened.

Essential ingredients:

  1. An offence has been committed.
  2. The accused knew or had reason to believe this.
  3. He caused evidence to disappear or gave false information.
  4. His intention was to screen the offender from punishment.

Illustration: After a murder, A burns the victim's blood-stained clothes to prevent the police from establishing the crime. A commits an offence under Section 201.

6. False Charge of Offence Made with Intent to Injure — Section 211​

Section 211 punishes a person who, with intent to cause injury to another, institutes or causes to be instituted any criminal proceeding, or falsely charges another with having committed an offence, knowing there is no just or lawful ground for the charge. Setting the criminal law in motion against an innocent person is treated as a serious abuse of the process of justice, and the punishment is enhanced where the false charge relates to a grave offence.

Illustration: A, knowing B to be innocent and intending to harass him, files a false complaint accusing B of dacoity. A is liable under Section 211.

7. Personating a Public Servant — Section 170​

Section 170 punishes a person who pretends to hold a particular office as a public servant (or falsely personates any other person holding such office) and, in that assumed character, does any act under colour of that office. Personation that strikes at the authority of public office undermines confidence in the administration of justice and government.

(Note: General cheating by personation is a separate offence defined in Section 416 and punishable under Section 419; it is a property/fraud offence rather than an offence against public justice.)

Illustration: A falsely represents himself to be a police officer and, in that character, purports to seize property from B. A commits an offence under Section 170.

8. Harbouring an Offender — Section 212​

Section 212 punishes a person who harbours or conceals another whom he knows or has reason to believe to be an offender, with the intention of screening him from legal punishment. The severity of punishment depends on the offence committed by the person harboured. (Note: the section does not apply to a spouse harbouring the other.)

9. Resistance and Obstruction to Lawful Authority — Sections 224, 225, 186​

Offences against public justice also include resisting lawful legal process:

  • Section 224 — a person's resistance to, or obstruction of, his own lawful apprehension for an offence.
  • Section 225 — resistance to, or obstruction of, the lawful apprehension of another person.
  • Section 186 — voluntarily obstructing a public servant in the discharge of his public functions.

(Assault or use of criminal force to deter a public servant from doing his duty is separately punishable under Section 353.)

Illustration: A, who is being lawfully arrested for theft, physically struggles and breaks free from the police. A may be liable under Section 224 in addition to the original offence.

10. Insult or Interruption to a Court — Section 228​

Section 228 punishes intentionally offering any insult, or causing any interruption, to a public servant while he is sitting in any stage of a judicial proceeding. This protects the decorum and functioning of the court. (Contempt of court is separately governed by the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.)

Common Themes and Exam Pointers​

  • Mens rea is central. Almost every offence in this chapter turns on the accused's knowledge, belief or intention. An innocent mistake, or an act done without intent to screen or injure, generally does not attract liability.
  • Offence against the State. Because these are wrongs against the administration of justice, many require the sanction or complaint of the court concerned before prosecution (see the procedural bar in Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / corresponding BNSS provisions).
  • Distinguish carefully: giving false evidence (S.191) vs. fabricating false evidence (S.192); causing disappearance of evidence to screen an offender (S.201) vs. harbouring the offender himself (S.212); false charge to injure (S.211) vs. ordinary defamation.

Conclusion​

Offences against public justice safeguard the reliability of the very process through which guilt and innocence are determined. Mastery of this chapter requires knowing not just the section numbers but the precise ingredients — especially the mental element — that distinguish one offence from another. Students should read the bare text of Chapter XI of the IPC (or the corresponding chapter of the BNS, 2023) alongside this guide, and verify the current governing statute for their examination.